These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content test
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
Dear Vaccinated People: Science Has Some Very Bad News for You
If you’ve been blindly trusting the people in charge for the past year and a half when it comes to the COVID shots, you may want to sit down and brace yourself for this story. The prestigious magazine called ‘Science’ (and no, it’s not a magazine about Anthony Fauci) has just published an important paper about the efficacy of the experimental mRNA shots against Omicron. If you’ve received two shots and at least one “booster” to protect you against COVID, you will have no resistance at all to Omicron in just a few months’ time. In addition, your boosted system stops protecting you against other serious diseases, including cancer.
Researchers in Great Britain published the latest findings. They’ve discovered that several months after getting a booster shot, a person’s antibodies and T-cells that protect against Omicron are basically non-existent. In fact, you’ll be in much worse shape than that.
If you’re fully vaccinated and boosted, and you’ve never previously been infected with any strain of COVID, you are much more likely to catch a serious “breakthrough” case of Omicron. A vaccinated person’s T-cell response is biased toward the earlier strains of COVID – you know, the strains like Delta that eventually vanished into thin air just like Donald Trump said they would, and which no longer exist?
The T-cell response is the part that has doctors and scientists particularly worried. The mRNA shots that rewrite your DNA appear to permanently rewire the immune system, so that the T-cell response tries to attack something that doesn’t exist in your body – instead of attacking the Omicron infection that’s there. Antibodies are the first portion of the immune system that tries to sweep a virus out of your bloodstream. The T-cells are the ones that target, attack and kill infected cells and help you produce better and more effective antibodies for later on.
Fully vaccinated and boosted celebrities and politicians all say the same thing when they catch COVID these days:
“It’s a good thing I’m fully vaccinated and boosted! Otherwise, this case of COVID that I caught would be much worse!”
The T-cell response in this study, however, proves that this is a lie. A fully vaxed and boosted person might not have even caught Omicron if they hadn’t been boosted! The research even suggests that since fully “vaccinated” and boosted people can never develop real antibodies to COVID in their immune systems, they are going to be prone to infection and reinfection by future strains of COVID for the rest of their lives. An unvaccinated person who catches COVID develops natural immunity, which includes antibodies and appropriate T-cell response.
The shots at this point cause the body to make one type of antibodies – antibodies that are effective against a strain of COVID that is GONE. But your broad antibody production is what really protects against a disease long-term. This study suggests that the COVID jabs are suppressing the development of broad antibody production against new strains of COVID, and against everything else.
That’s the truly terrifying prospect. Your body’s immune system is always fighting off something. Even if you’re a perfectly healthy person, there’s a great chance that cancer cells have tried to develop in your body at some point. And your robust, natural immune system immediately killed those cells. That’s because your body under normal (unvaccinated) circumstances had broad antibody production.
If the COVID shots are crushing broad antibody production, it means that vaccinated and boosted people have now been made incredibly susceptible to a host of diseases that are not COVID – including cancer. Have cancer diagnoses been skyrocketing since the rollout of the vaccines? Oh, you bet they have. Just ask any doctor.
Pfizer, Moderna, the FDA and the CDC have known about this all along. They said it out loud many times. The shots suppress broad antibody production. But COVID was such an important and dangerous disease, it was worth the risk of suppressing people’s immune systems against everything else.
I guess they were wrong again. If you’ve been fully vaccinated and boosted, it might be a good idea to get some bloodwork done and get your heart checked while you’re at it. You might have a very tough road ahead of you.
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
I have done so far this year working online and am a full time student. I am using an online business opportunity that I have heard of that has (agd-04) made so much money. It’s really easy to use and I’m so glad I discovered it. Here is what I do.
Copy For more details, visit ……………… https://rb.gy/svhlxx
I have done so far this year working online and am a full time student. I am using an online business opportunity that I have heard of that has (agd-05) made so much money. It’s really easy to use and I’m so glad I discovered it. Here is what I do.
Copy For more details, visit ……………… https://rb.gy/svhlxx
A$$ wipe
WhooDuh Thunk it! the Jabs being a NEGATIVE!
What is the actual title of this paper and where can one read the actual paper, instead of someone’s interpretation of it? I can’t find anything online about it. Everything I find from Science magazine says pretty much the opposite.
Can someone link to the post, please? I can’t find it & would love to have access to share with others. Thank you!
To the paper, not post!
Please share link to the paper this info comes from. If we want people to listen and not discount the info, we need to be able to show them the actual paper that was published. Anyone..? I’ve searched on “Science” journal website and can’t find anything remotely close to what this article is claiming.
I have done so far this year working online and am a full time student. I am using an online business opportunity that I have heard of that has (svf02) made so much money. It’s really easy to use and I’m so glad I discovered it. Here is what I do.
Copy For more details, visit ……. https://www.itscash.cf
I have done so far this year working online and am a full time student. I am using an online business opportunity that I have heard of that has (svf02) made so much money. It’s really easy to use and I’m so glad I discovered it. Here is what I do.
Copy For more details, visit ……. https://www.itscash.cf
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq1841
I think this is the link for which y’all are searching.
@ JD; I got a “link” for you, try Googling; “Death by Medicine By Gary Null, PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; and Dorothy Smith, PhD! “Something is wrong when regulatory agencies!…..showing that government-sanctioned medicine is the real hazard.” If you can consider 783,936 iatrogenic/ pharma “medicine” caused, Deaths, [each] & every year a big deal! The try Googling. “Big pharma big fines” then just maybe you’ll understand, you’ve/ we’ve been scamed. It’s just natural when going from a once, “One Nation Under God” to a “One Nation Under Democrats” acting as gods!
I have done so far this year working online and am a full time student. I am using an online business opportunity that I have heard of that has (svf02) made so much money. It’s really easy to use and I’m so glad I discovered it. Here is what I do.
Copy For more details, visit ……. https://cutt.ly/cKaW26i
Hilite the article with your coarser by holding the left button down while you roll up or down through the article, it will change color to blue or black or red then right click, then click on copy, then go into your mailbox, bring up an email blank, right click and click on paste. The article should appear in an email format then just put your name and or others in the address bar and hit send. I often send myself a copy so I can see that it worked right. You can also eliminate the ads and BS from the email, but take your time and get the idea first.
What’s the name of the British study in ‘nature’ that you’re reporting on or a link to it would be most useful. Thanks.
Seems like a Grifter wrote this paper. Science magazine does not have any article even remotely mentioning this talking point. Might be why there is not any reference to what the paper actually says – only snarky commentary instead.